Resisting TERF’s and Transforming Their Organizations

Tactics to Make Women Only Spaces Include All Women

TERF’s — Trans Exclusionary Regressive Fascists — are tools of the far right/alt-right establishment of America and the UK. They are bigots who promote transphobia as a political stance. They exist as agent provocateurs tasked with preventing the LGBTQ community from gelling into a cohesive political force that can oppose fascism. They claim to be “lesbians” and “feminists” while functioning as proxies for the white male oligarchs that seek to bury any and all queerness and to trap women in servitude.

Despite being expelled from the mainstream feminist movement in the 1970’s for their hate, TERF’s have formed numerous fringe organizations worldwide to push their misogynistic agenda. They represent an ongoing danger to the safety of any community they’re in. What can we learn from successful anti-fascist tactics used elsewhere to help combat and disrupt this existential threat to women and queers?

Posie Parker’s transphobic billboards were funded by America’s Christian right.

Some argue it’s better to ignore TERF’s and focus on building positive groups. The creation of inclusive spaces is always a good idea. However, TERF’s receive funding from evangelicals and other anti-LGBT organizations, with the specific orders to sow division and promote misogyny under the label of “radical feminism.” The entire “adult human female” campaign of Posie Parker came from the patriarchs of the Heritage Foundation, who used her as a meat puppet to disguise the white straight cis male privilege underlying the move.

Like the Proud Boys, Atomwaffen Division, and National Policy Institute, TERF organizations seek to brainwash young people and promote hate in communities wherever they are present. Simply ignoring them is not an option, anymore than ignoring the violence of Charlottesville or Pittsburgh.

Since we cannot remain still, we must act. So what form should those actions take? Fortunately, we have many good options.

Parallel Institutions

A solid first step is to create organizations that are inclusive to all that are redundant with whatever function the TERF’s run. Sometimes it’s enough to simply beat the TERF’s at their own game. People like less discrimination, not more. Our trend as a society is toward greater understanding of one another. For this to happen, you have to provide a viable alternative to whatever function the TERF’s are currently offering so people can choose to avoid them.

For example, in Vancouver, you have several great rape crisis centers, such as the WAVAW, that serve all women. That stands in contrast to centers who abuse the notion of “women only spaces” to ban women from aid. All of these centers are universally superior in safety, size, and quality to centers that are not inclusive.

In Austin, we have Central Texas Femdoms (CTFD), a kink group for dominant females that is trans inclusive. They formed due to the transphobic comments of the founder of another pro-Domme organization. As a result, the TERF run group is nowhere to be found, as CTFD is the one with access to local play spaces and clubs.

Camp Trans began as a parallel group in protest of the discrimination of MichFest.

A famous historical example is Camp Trans. This was the alternate music festival setup across from MichFest, a music festival that was sick with TERF influence. While it sadly ended in 2012, its legacy lives on. It served thousands of women of all kinds and provided a safe harbor for community to thrive. (More about MichFest later.)

Leadership Reform

You make a group that does everything the TERF group does, but without the unnecessary hate. Yet the TERF group finds a way to persist. Now what?

A gradual strategy that can succeed is infiltration and replacement. Entryism is a century old non-violent tactic that works in any group that uses voting to determine leadership. Gather a group of like-minded allies, join the group, and then vote one another into key positions. Attract more via outreach and over time the group will be geared toward promoting social justice and human rights.

N.K. Jemisin is the trailblazing SF Fantasy author who win 3 Hugo’s in a row, the first to ever accomplish that.

We have seen this approach yield splendid results in pop culture. “Good ol’ boy” clubs in science fiction, video games, comics have all but ceased to exist. Today, the first three-time Hugo Award winner is N.K. Jemisin. That’s a hard break with science fiction’s history of rewarding stale old white men. That was achieved thanks to the infiltration and replacement of the conservative fans by more and more progressive elements.

Noelle Stevenson was able to give us her amazing She-Ra series thanks to her work on comics.

We also see this at Marvel Comics, which publishes such groundbreaking work as Gabby Rivera’s America Chavez, which puts queer women front and center. That would’ve been unheard of without the editorial shift achieved through concerted entryism into that business by Heather Antos and other leaders. Noelle Stevenson’s gorgeous queer-centric She-Ra and the Princesses of Power series would not have been possible without the dissolution of the old barriers. Stevenson got the role of show runner thanks to her work in comics.

With TERF groups, many will likely try to ban trans women from membership. This can be worked around. Cis women allies can easily enter a given organization. If they work as a collective, it’s a matter of figuring out the number needed to achieve a simple majority (or whatever number is needed to overrule attempts to stop the bloc). For example, if a collective has about 25 members, then a group as small as 30 could wrest control from the bigots.

Then, when it comes time to select leaders, remove the old bigoted guard and install rational leadership. Done correctly, this is a wonderful bloodless democratic coup. It’s enabled since TERF’s are a tiny — if loud — minority of all women. Finding women willing to help replace their hate with love and inclusiveness is therefore not an impossible task.

This tactic is especially sound when trying to take over a group that has resources and performs functions that are important to the broader community, but happen to be biased against women. For example, discriminatory rape crisis centers on one hand perform an important function for the segment of women they do serve, even as they impose misogynist exclusionary definitions of who they’ll treat. Maintaining continuity for the delivery of this kind of service is important — no one wins if they’re shut down or disappear. A gradual internal take over simply allows the organization to stop being a hate group while still caring for women in need.

Purse Strings

Let’s say the group has taken steps to make entryism difficult or maybe their size makes that approach too difficult. Now external pressure becomes the main method, as this can yield positive results. The easiest target: the group’s money. Financial pressure is a proven way to cause a group to reform or shut them down so one of the before mentioned parallel groups can take their place.

There are several ways to hurt a hate group’s purse strings: political lobbying, boycotts, picketing, and lawsuits.

The CATA logo. Source.

In Canada, the Coalition Against Trans Antagonism (CATA) has done incredible work in lobbying city and province officials to defund TERF groups. Their effort has cost bigots tens of thousands in taxpayer money. Politicians will listen to and support the position that has the most political viability. TERF’s are a small part of their voter base, while those who support inclusion will tend to be the majority — at least in the saner parts of a nation. That means the political will of a left-wing leader will be to stop giving money to a TERF group if you push them to do so.

Still, this is assuming you’re not in a red state, as Trump voters are major backers of TERF policies. Always remember that where you see a TERF, behind them is someone in a MAGA hat cheering them on.

Boycotts have worked great on a broad scale. Boycotts work to deny a group sponsors and access to donors. One well-known success is the previously mentioned MichFest. Activists successfully made it so even performing at MichFest became a black mark on an artist’s record. They’d be denied spots at Pride events nationwide.

This pressure became so great that MichFest finally shut down and the land it used was sold to new owners, who have pledged to promote inclusive musical festivals. As we speak, a reborn MichFest, free of the bigoted old leadership, is in the works. It was a huge win for women internationally.

Picketing is as old as first wave feminism and the suffragettes. Standing outside a physical meeting place with signs is a proven effective tactic for raising awareness about hate. ANTIFA has used it to shut down people like Ben Shapiro and Milo Yiannopoulos with amazing efficiency. It was also effective for bringing attention to hate speech at the Vancouver Public Library, who sadly gave a platform to Nazi adjacent Meagan Murphy.

For closing locations that are a front for hate groups, picketing works well. Static locations are easy to patrol, stake out, and monitor. Everyone who goes in and out can be handed a pamphlet making them aware of why a given group should be avoided. This was done against the Vancouver Women’s Library, which was led by a known transphobe. It took time, but the patient and persistent activists won the day and the library was shut down, ending its distribution of hate speech pretending to be “feminism.”

Lawsuits are a classically American way to attack an organization’s funding. Essentially, you catch the TERF group violating someone’s civil rights (which they always are, since they discriminate) and then you sue them for damages. If enough people sue the organization, it can overwhelm their ability to fight back and they shut down, unable to continue functioning. Make sure your state or locality enshrines discrimination based on gender identity into law — that helps immensely.

The lawsuit method is a lot messier than the entryism method, and has several downsides. It siphons funds that could be spent on helping women into the hands of lawyers. Protracted legal battles could help them rally even more support from alt-right backers. It will take longer than taking it over from the inside, as it can take courts years to render critical rulings.

Morgane Oger is one of many activists leading the charge against hate groups in Canada.

However, this method is not without results. In Canada, Morgane Oger successfully sued Christian radical Bill Whatcott in 2019. The court specifically ruled that Whatcott mocking her for being a trans woman and stating that she was not a woman violated her human rights. That meant she was allowed to sue him and won a judgment against him for $55,000.

Here in the states, lawsuits have been effectively wielded against bakeries and cake shops that refuse to service LGBTQ customers, such as Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado. Even when Jack Phillips “won” a suit, he lost time and money. Even better, it drained funds from the legal funds the Christian conservatives use, making them waste their money. Repeatedly hammering him will work eventually in driving him out of business. A pizza shop and other businesses have been driven to bankruptcy and closure by similar methods.

Direct Action

“Deplatforming works.” — Jason Koebler

Unfortunately, there are TERF organizations that are highly resilient against threats to their financials. The Heritage Foundation is a major backer for many TERF groups, as mentioned before. Lobbying, boycotts, picketing, and lawsuits aren’t guaranteed to bring about the necessary changes. So what’s next after that? Direct action.

Direct action is where you go from targeting an institutional or organization to singling out the key leaders and propellants of hate. History shows that when singled out, many bigots will renege on their hateful ideas and begin to reform. And if they don’t, then their communities can expel them.

TERF’s, like all Nazis, have no right to a peaceful existence or steady employment. They have declared their support of fascism and have therefore declared their intent to directly harm the trans community wherever they’re found. They threaten the safety and dignity of others and therefore deserve none themselves until they choose to be human once more.

The usual caveats to the direct action approach apply. Be careful of misidentifying people. Attacking bystanders just makes TERF’s look sympathetic. Don’t do anything you can’t handle the consequences of.

Against Presence

The simplest form of direct action is to work on denying individual TERF’s their ability to communicate and spread hate speech. This includes platforms like social media, blogs, YouTube, and other outlets.

Social media has a mixed record of shutting down hate speech. Facebook sometimes treats “TERF” as a slur, even though it never has been. Twitter allows Neo-Nazis to retain accounts. Reddit has been very permissive of fake radfem subreddits that spread bigotry and target activists. Even Medium has bent the knee to TERF’s and censored articles calling out their hate directly. Still, taking screen shots, saving info, and reporting accounts is important to the fight.

Notify contacts if a TERF has snuck onto their friends list. I’ve personally caught a couple TERF’s trying to worm their way into feminist groups and gotten them banned. Report their blogs to WordPress and others to try and get them taken down. You may not shut down every TERF account you see, but every one that is suspended is a victory. Likewise, the more you can promote the isolation and containment of TERF’s on social media by denying them the ability to associate with moderate feminist elements, the weaker their influence on the community will be.

TERF’s thrive by trying to maintain a clean public image so they are attractive to young feminists who may not know better. They’re like abusive parents who beat and molest their children at home, but insist those children wear smiles when traveling outside. Deny them the cover of respectability where possible. If a group has a Wikipedia page, make sure it has documentation about them discriminating against women. Review bomb their Yelp and Facebook pages. Slam any online ads with comments.

Activists handing out fliers to make people aware that Vancouver Rape Relief is a TERF run hate group. Source.

For real world ads, deface posters they put up around town with your own notices about their status as a hate group. Wheat paste is great for this. You can find an excellent recipe for wheat paste in the Banner Drops, Stencils, & Wheatpaste zine available from the Virtual Gonzo Zine Library. Seize any handouts or fliers they distribute and replace them with your own. Produce zines condemning the group and distribute them in the same places the TERF’s tried to advertise. Kit O’Connell has great resources (such as the Days of Unity Antifascist Zine Collection) for zine creation and is also an anti-fascist opponent of TERF’s.

Control access to safe spaces. Don’t be afraid to gatekeep those who advocate for hate, as TERF’s do. Ban them from Pride Parades. If they try and muscle their way in, surround them, drown them out, and deny them any visibility or impact. CATA and others succeeded in this with the Vancouver Dyke March, when the VDM organizers meekly bent the knee to cis supremacist groups.

Doxxing is another effective tool against fascists, just as it can be against TERF’s. TERF’s are very similar to incels: they are keyboard warriors. They hide behind online personas to spew evil and feel safe in their own bubble. Doxxing takes that safety away from them in a way that causes many to quit on the spot. Since the goal of combating hate is to make the person stop spreading it, there is no question doxxing is an important and useful tool to that end.

Doxxing a white supremacist has proven effective in making them afraid. Once their info is found, their friends, family, and places of work are contacted. Nazis are usually fired and ostracized and thus given suitable social punishment for advocating harm against others. TERF’s should be subject to the exact same outcomes. If you can cause a TERF to lose their job, do so! They can, after all, simply stop being a TERF if they want to find employment again.

In 2019, the Center for Global Development stood up for trans rights when they bravely confronted TERF Maya Forstater about her online hate mongering. They fired her for violating their employee code of conduct. When she tried to sue them, they argued in court that her transphobia meant she had no right to employment. In a stunning victory for social justice and equality, the employment tribunal agreed!

“I consider that [Maya Forstater’s] view, in its absolutist nature, is incompatible with human dignity and fundamental rights of others,” wrote the tribunal judge in a splendid ruling. “I conclude from this…that [Maya Forstater] is absolutist in her view of sex and…she will refer to a person by the sex she considered appropriate even if it violates their dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. The approach is not worthy of respect in a democratic society.” Well said!

This ruling establishes as legal precedent that being a bigot — whether it be a white supremacist, homophobe, or TERF — is always legitimate grounds to terminate an employee. You are always within your rights to make a company aware of the viper in their midst so they can push the TERF out the door, just like what happened to Maya Forstater. At least that’s how it is in the United Kingdom. Hopefully the US will have legal mandates for denying employment to fascists and bigots at some point.

It is possible for TERF’s to try and fight their termination in courts. Fortstaer, for example, is currently appealing the tribunal’s ruling. What helps, though, is that by bringing such legal challenges they shine a light on themselves. They put their own information and name out there and associate it with hate. They demand to be seen — and we see them. That makes them dramatically unemployable, as even capitalist bootlickers will hesitate to hire an employee with such toxic baggage. So don’t just get a TERF fired — make sure they get publicity for being fired. Then no legal wrangling will ever stop them from being canceled.

Sam Lavigne, the NYU professor who helped make 1600 ICE agents taste the fear they caused to millions of women and children.

Plans are currently underway by several anti-fascist action groups to build a database of known alt-right members, containing all available information. This would be based on the work of Sam Lavigne, who bravely revealed the LinkedIn information of thousands of ICE agents in 2018, allowing them to be targeted for direct action nationally. The database would be accessible globally and protected via redundancy from ever being deleted. You can bet that any and all TERF’s will also be in that database.

What can you do to help when it comes online? If you find a TERF, do the following:

  • Write down their online handle and a link to whatever account you found them on.
  • If they have their real name posted, grab it.
  • Save a photo of their face if available.
  • Screen shot some of their offending posts as proof in case they try and delete evidence. Save it with Archive.
  • Record any personal info they have on Twitter or Facebook, such as place of employment, birthday, etc.

TERF’s have a history of being brazen in their confrontations and hide very little about their identities, so gathering most of this info is not hard. When the fascist database comes online, submit everything you have. That will give the global coalition against hate as complete a picture as possible of who needs re-education.

Against Property

Property damage is another escalation up the chain of direct action. While deplatforming and doxxing are legal (in the US), property damage can cross into criminal territory. This is not a path to choose lightly and extreme care must be exercised if you want to go this route.

A Texas Nomad gets his apartment tagged by brave ANTIFA members in Austin.

Still, despite the risks, vandalism has been effective against fascists. In Austin, for example, the apartment of a Texas Nomad who participated in Charlottesville was tagged by local ANTIFA. Activists also posted fliers around the neighborhood outlining where he worked and the routes he commonly traveled. This notified his neighbors that they had a bigot in their midst. It also made him aware that he could not hide behind a veil of online anonymity. It presented him with consequences for his actions.

It’s almost like this Nazi’s car was put in an oven.

Environmentalists have long used the destruction of car dealerships to fight for eco-friendly standards for their communities. In Germany, there’s the AfD — a group of literal Nazis — who are being actively resisted. One of their current tactics? Setting fire to the cars owned by AfD leadership. Imagine being a Nazi and waking up to find out your car had been torched like Dresden. It’s an appropriate signal for them!

Unions targeted bootlicking scab labor by throwing rocks and bricks through their windows. Some even fired shots into their homes, but aimed to avoid the people inside. These were frequently effective at keeping the picket lines firm. While illegal, those intimidation tactics saved the jobs of countless thousands and ensured capitalistic scum couldn’t take advantage of workers.

In many ways, feminists of today are involved in an ongoing picket line against the modern patriarchy. The Women’s March is an easy visual of this in action. They refuse to cooperate by the rules set by the cis white men who dominate society and seek to use solidarity as a bargaining tool. TERF’s are the scabs, working for right-wing organizations to try and break up that unity. It is very apt for us to take the position of union leaders and treat them like scabs.

You would not want to use vandalism against property you want to repurpose. For example, as mentioned previously, a rape crisis center operated by TERF’s should not be vandalized. That space can be reclaimed once the leadership is changed. Interruption of its current function would be detrimental to people receiving service from it.

Against Persons

What about bodily harm against bigots? Is that a valid tactic? Yes, but with important considerations. It’s the most serious form of corrective action you can use — and one very likely to get you in major trouble. Only use it as a tactic if you’re sure you can handle the consequence of being caught.

The punch that let every Nazi know they would never be safe.

There are several great examples of bodily harm being used against fascists. One of the most famous examples is Neo-Nazi Richard Spencer being punched. This helped make America realize the widespread invasion of Nazis into the public sphere. Even better, the person who did it has never been caught. They are living as a free person with the knowledge that they decked a Nazi. Similarly, there was the heroic trans woman who almost delivered a blow for justice against TERF Julie Bindel.

Still, we cannot all be so bold. While there is little that equals the raw emotional boost of giving a Nazi what they deserve, it isn’t something we’re all capable of.

What if throwing a punch is beyond you? An effective alternative is milkshake throwing. This was popularized in the UK against pro-rape political figures like Carl Benjamin (Sargon of Akkad). ANTIFA in Portland has used this with laudable success against bootlickers like Andy Ngo. Milkshakes deal minimal harm but incredible humiliation. If TERF’s couldn’t step into public venues without fear of being drenched in milkshakes, they might think twice about their allegiance to hate.

The late Willem von Spronsen, who gave his life fighting fascism.

It’s important to avoid killing. ANTIFA in America has never killed anyone and it’s good to stay that way. When Comrade Willem von Spronsen bravely targeted an ICE facility, he did so in a way that he knew would not result in a loss of life except for his own. He gave his life for a last stand to draw attention to Trump’s Holocaust along the US borders. Contrast that with the psychopath who ran down protesters at Charlottesville or the numerous alt-right terrorists responsible for nearly every mass shootings in America, such as in El Paso. We are activists, protesters, and defenders of justice — we are not cold-blooded killers.

If someone comes at you with the intent to take your life, then killing in self-defense is 100% justified. But a dead person cannot find redemption. They cannot change their ways. Worse, they may become a martyr and attract more people to the cause of white supremacists. Why give Trump an excuse to call TERF’s “good people?” (He already knows they’re on his side.) Generally speaking, killing is a step too far.

Conclusions

CATA members protesting TERF’s.

What should you do to counter the presence of TERF’s in your area? First, make a parallel organization that makes theirs redundant. Out-compete them. At the same time, infiltrate and take over their group from the inside to reform it into an actual feminist organization. If that’s not possible, go after their money however you can.

If they still refuse to cease spreading hate, begin direct action. Online, shut down their means of communication by deplatforming them from social media. Use doxxing to remove their anonymity so they have to own whatever vile things they say. In the real world, deny them advertising. Shut them out of safe spaces. Make their employers aware who they are and what they’ve said so they’re terminated. If absolutely necessary, escalate further into tagging vehicles, destructive disruptions, and, finally, making them take responsibility for harming others by reflecting that harm at their personal selves.

TERF’s like to portray themselves as the victims when you discuss protecting the community from their hate. They like to pretend that any kind of action against them is “violence against women.” This is false equivalence, an attempt to hijack the language of revolution for their evil ends.

When Richard Spencer was punched on live television, that wasn’t “violence against men” — it was action against fascism. If you take signs from TERF’s trying to insert messages of hate at a Pride Parade, that’s not “violence against women” — it’s action against bigots. When someone chooses to be a fascist they surrender any consideration you need to have for their dignity, possessions, or health — because they have chosen to have no regard for yours. The imperative to punch Nazis is always in place, regardless of what sex the Nazi is.

A fascist can always choose to peacefully change their ways and rejoin the community as a decent human being, which ends any need to treat them with hostility. But when TERF’s go after trans women and others, they don’t stop their harassment until the target is dead. This is why you are justified using any of the strategies outlined above when opposing their kind.

The Inaccuracy of “TERF”

Let’s Update the Acronym to Reflect Reality

I have a problem with the term “TERF” (Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist). It’s not a slur — never has been, never will be. It’s an attempt to describe a subset of bigoted women wearing masks of lesbianism to hide their hate filled bitter hearts. This group certainly needs a label, one that draws attention to these slaves of the patriarchy as they work against the best interests of women globally.

My problem: TERF is not an accurate descriptor. Let’s break it down to see why.

Trans Exclusionary

CATA protesters condemning TERF’s and SWERF’s as a declaration against oppression. Used with permission.

The first half of TERF — “Trans Exclusionary” — is correct. The Coalition Against Trans Antagonism (CATA) also lists “excluding, erasing, eradicating, exterminating” as other variants. TERF’s promote discrimination against women, primarily trans women. They also reject any non-binaries and gender queer people who are feminine presenting, use she/her pronouns in whole or part, or who at least partially identify with the inclusive term “woman.”

They push to ban trans women from sportsfrom rape crisis centers, and even bathrooms. They refuse to equate violence against trans women as violence against women. TERF’s were the first to employ physical violence and threats of violence against trans women to prevent them from organizing. They do this even when trans inclusive women outnumber them, such as at Michfest, where surveys found the majority of women in the early 90’s welcomed trans women. “Trans Exclusionary” is a very accurate term for what these monsters do.

The second half is where the acronym fails: “Radical Feminist.” Discriminating against women is neither “radical” nor “feminist,” let alone does it make someone a “radical feminist.”

Not Radicals

Bigotry is the center of all conservative views. Conservatives seek to preserve the existing oppression hierarchies that favor themselves. Since conservatives are run by rich white straight men, they support hierarchies that promote the interests of rich white straight men. For example, conservatives support capitalism because it preserves ongoing wealth inequality overwhelmingly in their favor.

Radicals stand opposed to the preservation of broken definitions and systems. They actively seek to tear down injustice wherever it is found and replace it with newer — and more equitable — systems. A radical will use any means available to fight back, whether that is education, community organizing, or direct action.

Those who backed slavery did so because their view of the inclusive term “humans” did not include African-Americans. They were preserving this discriminatory definition to preserve their own power, thus making them conservatives. Similarly, those who opposed the desegregation of schools because they did not think the inclusive term “students” included black children were seeking to preserve elite access to education for whites only. That made them conservatives. Abolitionists and civil rights supporters were radicals, not the people whose view of terms was deliberately exclusionary.

Posie Parker’s trans phobic billboard was funded by the American Far Right. Source.

And as for TERF’s? They use an outdated definition of woman: “adult human female.” They push this definition so much it’s become a gate symbol emblematic of the group. Samantha Hancox-Li points out the origin of its use goes back to Mumsnet Towers in 2015, a trans phobic Internet den. Right-wing activist Posie Parker made the phrase big in 2018 using money from the Heritage Foundation and American evangelicals. It’s a term created by conservatives and spread by TERF’s because of how it preserves the oppressive hierarchy.

The Heritage Foundation’s definition of women — “adult human female” — fails to recognize the validity of trans women and others. It’s a view of women that reduces them to objects defined by genitals alone — instead of a complex intersection of biology, society, psychology, personal preferences, and identification. This definition favors current power structures that benefit TERF’s, such as “women only spaces” (which exclude women TERF’s don’t like). By arguing that this definition should be preserved and enshrined, they are parroting conservative talking points.

We immediately see that “radical” is the exact opposite of what a TERF is doing and supporting. They are conservatives, preservers, bootlickers. They are fundamentally about opposing the progress that radicalism stands for. CATA states the problem well: “TERF’s are adept at co-opting the language of progressive feminism in order to push an incredibly regressive and hateful agenda.” They are Regressive.

Not Feminists

Consider the “feminist” label in TERF.

One of the big American crusaders against feminism was Phyllis Schafly, who tapped into public fear and resentment of women to shoot down the ERA. She was a traitor to society in the same vein as Margaret Thatcher. But she observed second-wave feminism from the outside and gave a stern warning: that the lesbian take over of the second wave would be its undoing. This turned out to be right, but not in the way she meant it.

Schafly was trying to imply that queer women were somehow inferior to straight women. That their rise to prominence would sabotage the movement as they lacked the merit to run it. There have been a great many amazing lesbian leaders of feminism, so her argument was plainly false.

Unfortunately, what did happen was the rise of a band of women who culturally appropriated the term “lesbian” and turned it into something that meant “women who hate other women.” These faux queers snuck into power under the guise of representation and pushed their regressive patriarchal ideology into the second wave. This also combined with stunning narcissism that often left them unable to think beyond their white privilege, alienating women of color. They divided women and sabotaged feminism for decades.

It wouldn’t be until third wave feminism that the wounds would begin to heal. In the third wave we had a definition of women that didn’t splinter us and allowed all of us to unite under a common banner. The third wave was the start of Intersectional Feminism, an ideology that opposes — rather than bootlicks — the patriarchy.

Logo of the Coalition Against Trans Antagonism, a key organization that opposes TERF lead hate groups.

TERF’s have never been feminists. When we call TERF’s “feminists,” we are ignoring the decades of philosophical harm they rendered to the feminist movement. They have been infiltrators intent on spreading ideas that prevent women from uniting and acting as one. They have always stood as one of the worst enemies of feminism in all its incarnations. As CATA tells us, “They [TERF’s] understand the core ideas of feminism and patriarchy, but turn their efforts toward excluding and harassing trans women instead of making the world safer and more welcoming for all women.”

The discord they sow is one of the many factors behind why Trump won election in 2016. It is their constant demand to divide and push away women from common cause that enables oppression — a fact they know and welcome. TERF’s are an explicit part of the fascist effort to “divide and conquer” the LGBT community so that all of the rights secured so far can be undone. Trump’s supporters openly admit that helping transphobic women drive a wedge between the LGB and the T will make it easier for them to role back anti-discrimination protections for all queers, minorities, and women.

The goal of TERFs is not the realization of feminist ideals, but to hide among women and say whatever is needed to keep us from fighting the common enemy: fascism. The true face of any TERF is that of a goose-stepping thug with delusions of grandeur. CATA observed this with the Vancouver Dyke March, noting that there is a “very real concern rooted in lived experience about TERF/SWERF fascist violence in the march.” They are servants of fascism through-and-through.

Conclusions

Radical feminists rejecting TERF ideology in the 1970’s. Source.

We have now that “Trans Exclusionary” is correct and should be retained. They are not “radicals,” though: they are regressive. They defend oppressive hierarchies to protect the interests of the privileged. They are not “feminists” — they are tools of fascists. Actual radical feminists have condemned TERF’s since the 1970’s, wishing them expelled from their movement. They take money and talking points from the anti-queer evangelical right of America. The same group that gave us Trump’s hellscape America.

This gives us our new term for them: Trans Exclusionary Regressive Fascists.

This has the benefit of still spelling TERF — thus immediately backwards compatible. It identifies those it labels as enemies of the people who groups like ANTIFA and BAMN need to target in their fight to liberate the common man. It makes clear that the adherents of this view are not part of the fight for social justice. They should not be confused for feminists, because they are feminism’s enemies.

They are bigots who are happen to be women. Bigotry — not gender — is their defining trait and it justifies any and all necessary means of opposing their victory. They have chosen to work with the straight white male oppressors of human society and so they must be treated like oppressors.

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started